Top 100 Researchers
Home A Century of AD Research Advertising
About JAD Alzheimer Award Recommend JAD
Editorial Board Press Releases Feedback
For Authors Subscriptions Search
Contents/Abstracts Related Links Letters to Editor

  JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

an IOS Press publication

FOR AUTHORS

Policy on Ethics

F O R   A U T H O R S

SYNOPSIS

Editorial Policy and Review Process
Editorial Board
Roles of the Associate and Senior Editors

SUBMISSION DETAILS

Submission Letter and Method of Transmission
Manuscript Preparation
Disclosure Statement
Submission Checklist
Publication Fee/Open Access
Copyright
Pre-Press/Proofs
 

POLICIES

Overview of Policies on Manuscript Submission
Policy regarding the NIH Public Access Policy mandate (PubMed Central)
Policy on the Use of  Animals
Policy on the Use of  Human Subjects
Policy on Ethics
Financial Disclosure
Information for Reviewers

REPRINTS

Offprints and Reprints 

The Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease affirms that misconduct, in the form of fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism, jeopardizes the success of the entire scientific endeavor. However, the primary responsibility for considering and resolving allegations of scientific misconduct must be pursued within the individual academic communities and institutions where the scientific work is carried out.  Every author of articles or abstracts submitted for publication assumes full responsibility, within the limits of his or her professional competence, for the accuracy of the report. In the case of multiple-authored papers, each author should have made a significant intellectual or practical contribution to the scientific work.  Authors submit articles with the understanding that reports must not have been submitted elsewhere.

Questions raised about the conduct of experiments or their presentation will be evaluated preliminarily by the Editor-in-Chief and, if appropriate, in consultation with the Associate Editor handling the review of the manuscript.  If deemed appropriate, the matter will be referred to the institution where the scientific work in question was performed.  The Journal expects that the matter would be reviewed in accordance with institutional procedures for handling allegations of misconduct. At all stages, every effort should be made to ensure that the process is fair and just, both for those who are accused of misconduct and for those who have raised the issue of scientific misconduct.

In the event that a published article or abstract is to be retracted, a statement of retraction will be published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.

 

top


http://www.comtecmed.com/cony/2010/mp.aspx

The Journal of Alzheimer's Disease is published by IOS Press. ©1998-2008 Journal of Alzheimer's Disease