%0 Journal Article %J J Alzheimers Dis %D 2018 %T Potential of Low Dose Leuco-Methylthioninium Bis(Hydromethanesulphonate) (LMTM) Monotherapy for Treatment of Mild Alzheimer's Disease: Cohort Analysis as Modified Primary Outcome in a Phase III Clinical Trial. %A Wilcock, Gordon K %A Gauthier, Serge %A Frisoni, Giovanni B %A Jia, Jianping %A Hardlund, Jiri H %A Moebius, Hans J %A Bentham, Peter %A Kook, Karin A %A Schelter, Bjoern O %A Wischik, Damon J %A Davis, Charles S %A Staff, Roger T %A Vuksanovic, Vesna %A Ahearn, Trevor %A Bracoud, Luc %A Shamsi, Kohkan %A Marek, Ken %A Seibyl, John %A Riedel, Gernot %A Storey, John M D %A Harrington, Charles R %A Wischik, Claude M %K Aged %K Aged, 80 and over %K Alzheimer Disease %K Antipsychotic Agents %K Cohort Studies %K Double-Blind Method %K Female %K Humans %K International Cooperation %K Male %K Mental Status and Dementia Tests %K Methylene Blue %K Middle Aged %K Treatment Outcome %X

BACKGROUND: LMTM is being developed as a treatment for AD based on inhibition of tau aggregation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of LMTM as monotherapy in non-randomized cohort analyses as modified primary outcomes in an 18-month Phase III trial in mild AD.

METHODS: Mild AD patients (n = 800) were randomly assigned to 100 mg twice a day or 4 mg twice a day. Prior to unblinding, the Statistical Analysis Plan was revised to compare the 100 mg twice a day as monotherapy subgroup (n = 79) versus 4 mg twice a day as randomized (n = 396), and 4 mg twice a day as monotherapy (n = 76) versus 4 mg twice a day as add-on therapy (n = 297), with strong control of family-wise type I error.

RESULTS: The revised analyses were statistically significant at the required threshold of p < 0.025 in both comparisons for change in ADAS-cog, ADCS-ADL, MRI atrophy, and glucose uptake. The brain atrophy rate was initially typical of mild AD in both add-on and monotherapy groups, but after 9 months of treatment, the rate in monotherapy patients declined significantly to that reported for normal elderly controls. Differences in severity or diagnosis at baseline between monotherapy and add-on patients did not account for significant differences in favor of monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with earlier studies in supporting the hypothesis that LMTM might be effective as monotherapy and that 4 mg twice a day may serve as well as higher doses. A further suitably randomized trial is required to test this hypothesis.

%B J Alzheimers Dis %V 61 %P 435-457 %8 2018 %G eng %N 1 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29154277?dopt=Abstract %R 10.3233/JAD-170560 %0 Journal Article %J J Alzheimers Dis %D 2017 %T Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis of the Default Mode and Salience Network for Target Identification in Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation of Alzheimer's Disease and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Networks. %A Pievani, Michela %A Pini, Lorenzo %A Ferrari, Clarissa %A Pizzini, Francesca B %A Boscolo Galazzo, Ilaria %A Cobelli, Chiara %A Cotelli, Maria %A Manenti, Rosa %A Frisoni, Giovanni B %K Alzheimer Disease %K Brain %K Databases, Bibliographic %K Deep Brain Stimulation %K Electroencephalography %K Frontotemporal Dementia %K Humans %K Image Processing, Computer-Assisted %K Magnetic Resonance Imaging %K Models, Neurological %X

BACKGROUND: The accurate choice of the site of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is an important factor in trial design.

OBJECTIVE: Based on the observation that Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) affect specific large-scale networks, i.e., the default mode network (DMN) and the salience network (SN), respectively, we aimed to identify population-average coordinates of these networks that could be used as potential targets in NIBS trials aiming to modulate these circuits.

METHODS: A systematic literature search of resting-state functional MRI studies reporting DMN and SN stereotactic coordinates was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Coordinate-based meta-analyses were conducted to identify consistent nodes of the DMN and SN using GingerALE BrainMap software and the activation likelihood estimation method.

RESULTS: DMN coordinates mapped primarily to mesial areas (posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus [Brodmann Area - BA 23/31] and medial prefrontal cortex [BA 9/10/32]). More superficial areas mapped to the bilateral parietal (angular gyrus [BA 39]), temporal (middle gyrus [BA 21]) and dorsolateral prefrontal (superior gyrus [BA 8]) cortex. SN coordinates mapped primarily to mesial and deep frontal areas (anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex [BA 24/32]), but more superficial areas mapped to the bilateral parietal (supramarginal gyrus [BA 40]) and the right dorsolateral prefrontal (middle gyrus [BA 9/10]) cortex.

CONCLUSIONS: NIBS should target the bilateral angular, the middle temporal cortex, or superior frontal gyri in AD for DMN modulation, and the right middle frontal or supramarginal gyri in bvFTD for SN modulation.

%B J Alzheimers Dis %V 57 %P 825-843 %8 2017 %G eng %N 3 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28304293?dopt=Abstract %R 10.3233/JAD-161105 %0 Journal Article %J J Alzheimers Dis %D 2016 %T Genetic Counseling and Testing for Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: An Italian Consensus Protocol. %A Bocchetta, Martina %A Mega, Anna %A Bernardi, Livia %A Di Maria, Emilio %A Benussi, Luisa %A Binetti, Giuliano %A Borroni, Barbara %A Colao, Rosanna %A Di Fede, Giuseppe %A Fostinelli, Silvia %A Galimberti, Daniela %A Gennarelli, Massimo %A Ghidoni, Roberta %A Piaceri, Irene %A Pievani, Michela %A Porteri, Corinna %A Redaelli, Veronica %A Rossi, Giacomina %A Suardi, Silvia %A Babiloni, Claudio %A Scarpini, Elio %A Tagliavini, Fabrizio %A Padovani, Alessandro %A Nacmias, Benedetta %A Sorbi, Sandro %A Frisoni, Giovanni B %A Bruni, Amalia C %K Alzheimer Disease %K Amyloid beta-Peptides %K Consensus %K Female %K Follow-Up Studies %K Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration %K Genetic Counseling %K Genetic Testing %K Humans %K Italy %K Male %K Peptide Fragments %K Psychiatric Status Rating Scales %X

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing of familial Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is attracting interest thanks to innovative primary prevention clinical trials and increased request for information by at-risk individuals. However, ethical, social, and psychological implications are paramount and genetic testing must be supported by structured genetic counseling. In Italy, practice parameters and guidelines for genetic counseling in dementia are not available.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a nationally harmonized protocol for genetic counseling and testing of familial AD and FTLD.

METHODS: Activities were carried out in the context of the Italian Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Network (IT-DIAfN) project, a national network of centers of excellence with expertise in managing patients with familial AD and FTLD. A survey of the literature on genetic counseling protocols and guidelines was conducted. Local protocols for genetic counseling were surveyed. Differences and commonalities among protocols were identified and discussed among project partners. Consensus was reached following implicit aggregation methods.

RESULTS: Consensus was reached on a protocol for patients with clinically diagnosed familial AD or FTLD and a distinct protocol for their at-risk relatives. Genetic counseling should be provided by a multidisciplinary team including a geneticist, a neurologist/geriatrician, and a psychologist/psychiatrist, according to the following schedule: (i) initial consultation with tailored information on the genetics of the dementias; (ii) clinical, psychological, and cognitive assessment; if deemed appropriate (iii) genetic testing following a structured decision tree for gene mutation search; (iv) genetic testing result disclosure; (v) psychological support follow-up.

CONCLUSION: This genetic counseling protocol provides Italian centers with a line of shared practice for dealing with the requests for genetic testing for familial AD and FTLD from patients and at-risk relatives, who may also be eligible participants for novel prevention clinical trials.

%B J Alzheimers Dis %V 51 %P 277-91 %8 2016 %G eng %N 1 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26901402?dopt=Abstract %R 10.3233/JAD-150849 %0 Journal Article %J J Alzheimers Dis %D 2016 %T Neurophysiological assessment of Alzheimer's disease individuals by a single electroencephalographic marker. %A Lizio, Roberta %A Del Percio, Claudio %A Marzano, Nicola %A Soricelli, Andrea %A Yener, Görsev G %A Başar, Erol %A Mundi, Ciro %A De Rosa, Salvatore %A Triggiani, Antonio Ivano %A Ferri, Raffaele %A Arnaldi, Dario %A Nobili, Flavio Mariano %A Cordone, Susanna %A Lopez, Susanna %A Carducci, Filippo %A Santi, Giulia %A Gesualdo, Loreto %A Rossini, Paolo M %A Cavedo, Enrica %A Mauri, Margherita %A Frisoni, Giovanni B %A Babiloni, Claudio %K Aged %K Alzheimer Disease %K Biomarkers %K Brain Mapping %K Case-Control Studies %K Cognition Disorders %K Electroencephalography %K Female %K Humans %K Italy %K Magnetic Resonance Imaging %K Male %K Middle Aged %K Occipital Lobe %K Rest %K ROC Curve %K Turkey %X

Here we presented a single electroencephalographic (EEG) marker for a neurophysiological assessment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients already diagnosed by current guidelines. The ability of the EEG marker to classify 127 AD individuals and 121 matched cognitively intact normal elderly (Nold) individuals was tested. Furthermore, its relationship to AD patients' cognitive status and structural brain integrity was examined. Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) freeware estimated cortical sources of resting state eyes-closed EEG rhythms. The EEG marker was defined as the ratio between the activity of parieto-occipital cortical sources of delta (2-4 Hz) and low-frequency alpha (8-10.5 Hz) rhythms. Results showed 77.2% of sensitivity in the recognition of the AD individuals; 65% of specificity in the recognition of the Nold individuals; and 0.75 of area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Compared to the AD subgroup with the EEG maker within one standard deviation of the Nold mean (EEG-), the AD subgroup with EEG+ showed lower global cognitive status, as revealed by Mini-Mental State Evaluation score, and more abnormal values of white-matter and cerebrospinal fluid normalized volumes, as revealed by structural magnetic resonance imaging. We posit that cognitive and functional status being equal, AD patients with EEG+ should receive special clinical attention due to a neurophysiological "frailty". EEG+ label can be also used in clinical trials (i) to form homogeneous groups of AD patients diagnosed by current guidelines and (ii) as end-point to evaluate intervention effects.

%B J Alzheimers Dis %V 49 %P 159-77 %8 2016 %G eng %N 1 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26444753?dopt=Abstract %R 10.3233/JAD-143042 %0 Journal Article %J Lancet Neurol %D 2014 %T Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria. %A Dubois, Bruno %A Feldman, Howard H %A Jacova, Claudia %A Hampel, Harald %A Molinuevo, José Luis %A Blennow, Kaj %A DeKosky, Steven T %A Gauthier, Serge %A Selkoe, Dennis %A Bateman, Randall %A Cappa, Stefano %A Crutch, Sebastian %A Engelborghs, Sebastiaan %A Frisoni, Giovanni B %A Fox, Nick C %A Galasko, Douglas %A Habert, Marie-Odile %A Jicha, Gregory A %A Nordberg, Agneta %A Pasquier, Florence %A Rabinovici, Gil %A Robert, Philippe %A Rowe, Christopher %A Salloway, Stephen %A Sarazin, Marie %A Epelbaum, Stéphane %A de Souza, Leonardo C %A Vellas, Bruno %A Visser, Pieter J %A Schneider, Lon %A Stern, Yaakov %A Scheltens, Philip %A Cummings, Jeffrey L %K Alzheimer Disease %K Biomarkers %K Humans %K International Cooperation %K Phenotype %K Practice Guidelines as Topic %K Societies, Medical %X

In the past 8 years, both the International Working Group (IWG) and the US National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association have contributed criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that better define clinical phenotypes and integrate biomarkers into the diagnostic process, covering the full staging of the disease. This Position Paper considers the strengths and limitations of the IWG research diagnostic criteria and proposes advances to improve the diagnostic framework. On the basis of these refinements, the diagnosis of AD can be simplified, requiring the presence of an appropriate clinical AD phenotype (typical or atypical) and a pathophysiological biomarker consistent with the presence of Alzheimer's pathology. We propose that downstream topographical biomarkers of the disease, such as volumetric MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose PET, might better serve in the measurement and monitoring of the course of disease. This paper also elaborates on the specific diagnostic criteria for atypical forms of AD, for mixed AD, and for the preclinical states of AD.

%B Lancet Neurol %V 13 %P 614-29 %8 2014 Jun %G eng %N 6 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24849862?dopt=Abstract %R 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0