%0 Journal Article %J Lancet Neurol %D 2014 %T Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria. %A Dubois, Bruno %A Feldman, Howard H %A Jacova, Claudia %A Hampel, Harald %A Molinuevo, José Luis %A Blennow, Kaj %A DeKosky, Steven T %A Gauthier, Serge %A Selkoe, Dennis %A Bateman, Randall %A Cappa, Stefano %A Crutch, Sebastian %A Engelborghs, Sebastiaan %A Frisoni, Giovanni B %A Fox, Nick C %A Galasko, Douglas %A Habert, Marie-Odile %A Jicha, Gregory A %A Nordberg, Agneta %A Pasquier, Florence %A Rabinovici, Gil %A Robert, Philippe %A Rowe, Christopher %A Salloway, Stephen %A Sarazin, Marie %A Epelbaum, Stéphane %A de Souza, Leonardo C %A Vellas, Bruno %A Visser, Pieter J %A Schneider, Lon %A Stern, Yaakov %A Scheltens, Philip %A Cummings, Jeffrey L %K Alzheimer Disease %K Biomarkers %K Humans %K International Cooperation %K Phenotype %K Practice Guidelines as Topic %K Societies, Medical %X

In the past 8 years, both the International Working Group (IWG) and the US National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association have contributed criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that better define clinical phenotypes and integrate biomarkers into the diagnostic process, covering the full staging of the disease. This Position Paper considers the strengths and limitations of the IWG research diagnostic criteria and proposes advances to improve the diagnostic framework. On the basis of these refinements, the diagnosis of AD can be simplified, requiring the presence of an appropriate clinical AD phenotype (typical or atypical) and a pathophysiological biomarker consistent with the presence of Alzheimer's pathology. We propose that downstream topographical biomarkers of the disease, such as volumetric MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose PET, might better serve in the measurement and monitoring of the course of disease. This paper also elaborates on the specific diagnostic criteria for atypical forms of AD, for mixed AD, and for the preclinical states of AD.

%B Lancet Neurol %V 13 %P 614-29 %8 2014 Jun %G eng %N 6 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24849862?dopt=Abstract %R 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0 %0 Journal Article %J Alzheimers Dement %D 2011 %T The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. %A Albert, Marilyn S %A DeKosky, Steven T %A Dickson, Dennis %A Dubois, Bruno %A Feldman, Howard H %A Fox, Nick C %A Gamst, Anthony %A Holtzman, David M %A Jagust, William J %A Petersen, Ronald C %A Snyder, Peter J %A Carrillo, Maria C %A Thies, Bill %A Phelps, Creighton H %K Alzheimer Disease %K Biomarkers %K Cognition Disorders %K Diagnosis, Differential %K Diagnostic Imaging %K Humans %K National Institute on Aging (U.S.) %K Practice Guidelines as Topic %K Societies, Medical %K United States %X

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association charged a workgroup with the task of developing criteria for the symptomatic predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD), referred to in this article as mild cognitive impairment due to AD. The workgroup developed the following two sets of criteria: (1) core clinical criteria that could be used by healthcare providers without access to advanced imaging techniques or cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and (2) research criteria that could be used in clinical research settings, including clinical trials. The second set of criteria incorporate the use of biomarkers based on imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures. The final set of criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to AD has four levels of certainty, depending on the presence and nature of the biomarker findings. Considerable work is needed to validate the criteria that use biomarkers and to standardize biomarker analysis for use in community settings.

%B Alzheimers Dement %V 7 %P 270-9 %8 2011 May %G eng %N 3 %1 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21514249?dopt=Abstract %R 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008